Analysing the Common Conception that Power Requires Violence and Viceversa

For example, it is widely believed that power and violence form an interrelated relationship, such as people need to exercise violence, just as violence is required to gain power. It is the same as violence. As Mao explains once, Power comes from barrels (Arendt 1972, 113). This article is meant to question this common concept and its discourse. First of all, through Marx, Weber's work to define violence and power, and violence and power cast doubt on what they believe to be two different things. The third violence theory of these articles distinguish between violence and power. Arendt claims that the two concepts are actually opposite though the left and right theorists regard violence as an expression of extreme power. As voluntary compliance supersedes, power comes from collective will and does not require violence to achieve one of its objectives. When the government begins to lose its legitimacy, violence becomes an artificial means for the same purpose, and therefore it can onl y be found without power. Bureaucracy was then defined as an unmanned opponent, and hence reestablished missing relationships with the people they dominated, and thus became the source of ideal violence. Violence brings pain, but violence is not always seen. Understanding traditional violence follows the general approach of showing violence in the form of physical injuries or injuries. The concept of structural violence has been used in the Marxist theorist's vocabulary in analyzing the relationship of class structure, power and labor exploitation. Regardless of whether these people encountered ideologies or beliefs, they are drawn as enemies without even knowing their status. Flaherty painted Narok as a barbarian and drew this hegemonic power. The locals are restricted to one reality, only distorted and reflect only a fraction of the truth, the attacker 's approach seems to be racial discrimination and paranoia. Hegemony is the concept of leadership or control proposed by the rulin g class. In today's society, people think that supremacy is common sense. It is the cultural power proposed by the authorities, not traditional violence or power. The theory was developed by Marxist theory and Antonio Gramsci. Hegemism is based on the Marxist ruling class and the working class theory. Hegemony can be defined as social anomalies. For example, the cultural structure is dominated by the dominant class and is communicated to the working class as common sense. Hegemony is a tool for socially powerful people to exploit cultural influences to adapt classes that are less powerful to a particular social structure or culture, in order to achieve the best interests of powerful people.